Ever wondered, what will always be the RPG Game most significant thing that helps make specific your proposed event continues as smoothly as desired? The idea is planning to be the particular staff that's deployed with their personal couple of responsibilities. President Bill Clinton. Chevelle models ranged coming from simple in regards in order to the pocket loved ones cars to convertibles and also powerful coupes. These kind of factions consist of Greco-Roman, Barbarians, as well as Eastern cultures. This sometimes happens in poker, it could occur from sports betting, often it happens online, it sometimes happens at the track or even inside your casino.
Compile most your loved ones members budget effortlessly members in the household. A Person might prefer to merely do oral along with some other swinging partners as well as heavy petting. The idea could always be placed using a trigger mechanism, what this indicates is it only drains the actual battery when you may be truly vacuuming - this features extended its battery into a potential 26 minutes, moreover you're able to obtain ten minutes of upper continuous suction & then six minutes using the actual highest (for the harder tough tasks). In your event that this can always be the situation we must just hang in in there as well as stay assured which items will boost more than time.
If there's certainly absolutely no obvious direction yet, possibly one with the most prudent as well as straight forward approach to manage the actual surplus cash would be to place it inside the money marketplace in order to earn interest. each staff hired or permanent have being conscious of entire layout of the event, the particular meals / drinks arrangement counters, emergency exits, etc. so how should we cope along with losing streaks? How can we the actual direction in our cash flow? How do we maintain faith in which eventually we have got been planning to win?.
Which offers the actual Greatest Cleaning Suction Power?. " And Also then start answering the objections inside the convincing as well as positive manner. Germany can be among your largest pharmaceutical markets inside the world. By: Aaron Hall.
In just about any given election, irrespective in the political environment or leanings, the media and also talking heads often speculate which will get (in some cases advert nauseum). Particular facets regarding infrastructure, operations, as well as strategic thinking have got proven successful, while various other medication will be destined to fail. Your remaining portion regarding the components are generally revenue budget, obtain as well as expense associated with sales budget, operating budget and money budget.
The exact same relates to virtually any kind of gambling. Visit StacyOQuinn. Several of those executives arrive as getting a a section of normal contract regarding hiring venues as well as with time they're offered by further expenses that are optional anyways.
If anyone must shut much more revenue to your legitimate residence business, think regarding using the Dani Johnson Script Book. Go to StacyOQuinn. The Actual smartest thing to be able to usually do is if you must do win in online betting then simply perform with a particular percentage of one's winnings. rtx?id=14951&alias=discounts-car-rental-flights.
Talk to a psychotherapist online. Go to: and e-mail today to ask your questions about online therapy over Skype.
I will be very happy to answer your questions about Skype counseling therapy, and when you are ready, you can schedule a Skype therapy session with me.
If you would like to talk with a psychotherapist online, then visit my YouTube Channel: to discover more about Online Counseling over Skype for overcoming talk to a therapist online chronic anxiety and excessive worrying and depression, addictions, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Psychological Trauma and other common types of psychological suffering not requiring medical treatment.
Talk to a therapist online - See a psychotherapist online via Skype
IF THE GOLDEN State Warriors are built around a Big Four, Zaza Pachulia might be the fifth. Now in his 14th season, Pachulia has never averaged more than 12 points per game. His style of play? The opposite of glitzy. In other words, he'd be incredibly out of place in the NBA All-Star Game.
Yet when the NBA announced the final tally of fan votes -- the first step in a process that determines the All-Star starters -- there was Pachulia, with 1,528,941 votes, second only to Kevin Durant among all frontcourt players in the Western Conference, well ahead of Spurs star Kawhi Leonard, who is an MVP candidate, as well as Anthony Davis, Draymond Green and DeMarcus Cousins.
Pachulia, currently out with a strained rotator cuff, also finished surprisingly high a year ago. Green, his Warriors teammate, said he wishes Pachulia would tell him his secret.
"He just won't tell me how he keeps doing it," Green told ESPN's Ethan Sherwood Strauss.
Something, it's fair to say, seems amiss.
We live in a time in which digital tricksters seem to be having their way with just about every system imaginable. The most private conversations, including those involving a national security adviser, a presidential candidate's emails and diplomatic cables, have all been shared with astonishing regularity. Voting hijinks have corrupted online fan participation in ways both large and small -- from those that send Pitbull to play a concert at a Walmart in Kodiak, Alaska, to those that result in an endangered humpback whale being renamed "Mister Splashy Pants."
Analogous scandals have rocked television shows "American Idol" and "America's Next Top Model" as well as the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame and Major League Baseball. The National Hockey League has suffered two such incidents, one in which borderline NHL player John Scott was voted into the All-Star Game in the name of hilarity -- although in fairness, he did score two goals -- and another in which the league nearly succumbed to a home-brewed fan-voting device called a "vote-o-matic."
The NBA has used fan votes to pick All-Star starters since the 1974-75 season, but it was long based on paper ballots handed out at arenas, bars and other places fans congregated. As the process moved online in 2001, the league has had embarrassing results here and there, including Yao Ming being elected a starter in the 2011 game after he'd suffered a career-ending injury.
But this year is different. This year fans voted on NBA.com, the NBA App, Twitter, Facebook, Google, and Sina Weibo and Tencent Microblogs in China. Across all the platforms combined, each fan was entitled to one ballot of 10 players per day, between Christmas and Jan. 16. The NBA's voting comes, like many fan voting systems, with a particular vulnerability: You can vote without being verified.
"Twitter is an open platform, and you can't protect yourself from someone else's open platform," says Brad Parscale, president of Texas-based web design and marketing firm Giles-Parscale, and the former digital director of Donald Trump's presidential campaign. "If your goal is to accurately measure fan support for a player, you would build a system that's authenticated to a single device [such as a cellphone]. If your goal is to change the narrative to grow the excitement of the game, then you would use an open social network."
The NBA says it uses internal screening and third-party vendors to screen out fraudulent votes. The league added a tweak this year that sources say was born of Pachulia's suspiciously high finish a year ago: Fans hold only 50 percent of the vote to determine All-Star starters. The vote of current players counts for 25 percent, and a media panel has the final 25 percent of the say.
Those mediating factors knocked Pachulia out of the All-Star Game. But they didn't answer the most basic question: Is the NBA All-Star fan vote a sham?
A Graphika image shows Twitter accounts that attempted votes for Kawhi Leonard. The more followers, the bigger the circle. Graphika has sorted accounts by topics of interest, which are color coded.
TO THE CASUAL observer, the Pachulia vote was the most alarming. But to John Kelly, the startling outlier was the Spurs' Kawhi Leonard. Kelly is the CEO and founder of the New York-based social media intelligence firm Graphika, which monitors, categorizes and maps social media traffic for public and private clients. Graphika sifted through more than 5 million tweets on behalf of ESPN and found all sorts of interesting things about NBA All-Star voting, including 10 hyperactive bot accounts voting for Leonard about 1,000 times per day, a figure that Kelly called "outrageously high."
And of all the ways you could vote, Twitter, in particular, seemed to be hot for Leonard. For players such as Pachulia, Kevin Durant and Draymond Green, a typical account that voted for them on Twitter did so about three times. For Leonard, the number was, per Graphika, 6.46, the highest in the league. More starkly, about 39 percent of the tweets attempting to cast for Leonard came from accounts created since Dec 1, 2016.
And those votes were coming from new accounts with names like @kawhibot.
"If your central question is, 'Do these accounts look fishy?' -- the answer is unequivocally yes," said Ron J. Williams, founder and managing partner of proofLabs, a Brooklyn-based strategy and product development studio. "It may be some combination of bots and human-controlled accounts, but it certainly looks like a coordinated effort to game Twitter's trending algorithm."
There is no sure way to know whether those efforts were successful in registering actual votes. The NBA screens out suspicious-looking votes, but won't say exactly how.
NBA spokesperson Mike Bass would say only: "We examine for voting irregularities on a consistent basis and monitor for bots and other manipulations. We have measures to detect improper voting, and any votes that do not comply with our rules are voided."
What's certain is that someone was trying to get Leonard in the game. When we began to ask experts whom it might be, many suggested asking Parscale. A former Spurs season-ticket holder, Parscale directed Trump's digital efforts during the presidential campaign from a low-slung building along the 410 freeway in northern San Antonio. A Bloomberg report detailed his mastery of the emerging art of exercising digital influence. The technique focused on using more than 100 people to solidify the positions of likely Trump supporters -- and sow doubt wherever influential groups of Clinton supporters gathered online.
When asked in January if he was behind the bots voting for Leonard, Parscale wrote in an email, "No, I didn't even know Kawhi was up for the award. I have been very busy with getting Trump elected."
But he did quickly suggest that the system has vulnerabilities.
"Here's the issue: There's no way to perfectly lock this out, and the way [the NBA] did it is designed to create narrative," Parscale said. "There's no way around it. I might have 1,000 technical ways to make it limited, but there's no way it's locked in."
IT WAS A bitterly cold Christmas Day in central Macedonia when Aleksander Saklev, a 21-year-old programmer, tweeted at the Spurs' official Twitter account. The NBA's All-Star voting season had kicked off that day, and Saklev wanted to help put his favorite player, Kawhi Leonard, in the All-Star Game.
Saklev saw this tweet from the Spurs.
In response, he tweeted at the Spurs from his @sakle17 handle: "Hello if today I retweet 10 tweets that say ex. Kawhi Leonard #NBAVOTE does that count as 10 or just 1?"
The Spurs did not reply to his inquiry, but another Twitter user chimed in to tell Saklev that it Malaysia web design company would count as 10 votes.
With that, Saklev went to work.
Using programming tools Raspberry Pi and Python, he immediately programmed 10 separate Twitter bots to vote for Leonard, who became Saklev's favorite player during the 2013 NBA Finals.
"I loved how he played the game," Saklev told ESPN by email. "I instantly did research on his rise to the NBA and was amazed at how he overcame the death of his father and how he appreciates his mother and how humble he is generally."
Though Saklev had fewer than 200 followers on his personal account, he believed he could single-handedly make Leonard an All-Star starter. Saklev's system was remarkably simple: Anytime some fan tweeted the phrase "Kawhi Leonard #NBAVOTE," Saklev's 10 Twitter bots would automatically retweet it, in the hopes of it counting as 10 votes.
By Dec. 28, the 10 bots -- with aliases named after Leonard (such as @kleonard95, @kleonard1995), Kevin Spacey (@kspacey 17) and Saklev's favorite soccer players, Luis Nani and Rio Ferdinand (@luisnani1995 and @rioferdy71) -- were up and running. Fans around the world found these egg-avatar accounts retweeting their Leonard votes within seconds. Soon enough, Saklev saw his bot farm create more than 200,000 votes for Leonard.
As Pachulia rose through the voting ranks, Saklev grew antsy, thinking another high finish for Pachulia could inspire further changes by the NBA. About two weeks after launching his Twitter bots, Saklev tweeted, "NBA fans don't be mad next year when fan voting for all star is abolished. Remember you voted for Zaza this year..."
Saklev generated nearly 250,000 attempted votes for Leonard. But after the first voting ballot results were released to the public, Saklev had a realization: The NBA was filtering out his votes.
"Everyone thinks that this is made to make a lot of votes," Saklev said in an email. "But after doing research about the voting system, no matter whether you tweet or retweet, it counts as 1 per day."
Saklev had built the bots to no avail.
AT 7:22 P.M. on Jan. 7, Justin Bieber issued a command to his nearly 90 million Twitter followers, the second-most on the social media platform behind fellow pop music star Katy Perry:
Two minutes later, Bieber, who has more followers than all but 15 countries have people, doubled down: "I got u bro. Best guy right here. Chris Paul. @CP3 #NBAVote."
Like most of Bieber's tweets, these two instantly screamed across the web, eventually combining for more than 89,000 retweets and 135,000 favorites.
Graphika's evidence suggests Bieber accounted for more than half of Chris Paul's Twitter votes.
This Graphika image shows Twitter accounts that voted for Chris Paul. The bigger the circle, the more the followers. Justin Bieber and the flood of votes Paul subsequently got from Twitter users whom Graphika categorizes as Bieber and pop music fans overshadow basketball fans.
Paul, who will miss the All-Star Game because of a thumb injury, finished fifth among Western Conference guards, with 735,460 fan votes from Twitter, Facebook, Google, NBA.com and in the NBA App combined. Fans of LeBron James helped him tally an NBA-high 1.89 million votes, but according to Graphika's Kelly, no one rocked the vote better than Bieber did for Paul.
"Justin Bieber was incredibly effective at getting his followers to vote for Chris Paul; that's the good news," Kelly said.
As you can see in Graphika's map, accounts known to be influenced by Bieber created a lot of votes for Paul.
"The bad news for Paul was that most of those followers did it just once, whereas the engaged basketball fans typically voted for their players several times," Kelly said. "So the true fan vote counts for more in the long run."
Injured 76ers center Joel Embiid is credited with an authentic and inventive social media presence, and it shows. His Twitter votes come from all over and include a strong foundation of small accounts -- not unlike a politician with large numbers of small donors. The founder of Graphika, which made this image, calls it a "picture of success."
PHILADELPHIA 76ERS CENTER and social media darling Joel Embiid is inventing new and better ways to connect with fans. Graphika found that Embiid's aggressive and colorful Twitter campaign to drum up support for his All-Star candidacy created a robust group of digital followers that is unlike other NBA stars. For instance, Kevin Durant's online votes came largely from Warriors fans, but Embiid received love from 76ers fans, Eagles fans and Jayhawks fans as well as social activists and many others. A full 84 percent of the accounts supporting Embiid were from communities outside of the local Philly sports scene, including national pro and college sports fans as well as music and entertainment fans.
"This is who you want to be," Kelly said Malaysia web design company after examining Embiid's results. "This is the picture of success."
When All-Star reserves were announced, Embiid, who finished third in the popular vote among East big men, with 922,174 votes, did not make the team. But it was not due to a lack of digital trying.
"Once again," he tweeted, "the popular vote didn't matter..."
Graphika found that Zaza Pachulia's social votes came largely from Facebook. In this chart, each circle represents a Facebook account that voted for Pachulia; the more the likes, the bigger the circle. Support from his home country of Georgia comes from many different sources -- and vastly outweighs his U.S. support.
WHICH BRINGS US back to the epicenter of this year's controversy, Pachulia, about whom Graphika's analysis reveals one huge surprise: Pachulia's eye-popping social media vote totals look credible. They come largely from Facebook and largely from Pachulia's home country of Georgia, but in a manner that is not easily identifiable as fishy. There are no obvious bots generating huge numbers of votes, but rather many different individuals voting a few times each.
"He's got not just the Georgian basketball fans engaged," Kelly said, "he's got the whole society."
Pachulia received support from Georgia-based social media accounts that Graphika identified as sports fans, but also from everyone else, from techies and marketing professionals to fashionistas and the literati.
In all, about one-third of the Twitter accounts and four-fifths of the public Facebook pages supporting Pachulia were from Pachulia's home country. And those Georgian Twitter fans voted an average of 3.84 times each vs. 2.77 times each for his U.S. basketball fans.
In other words, the NBA's fishiest voting returns look fishy mostly because the system isn't used to seeing such large numbers of super-motivated fans.
Or to put it another way: In 2015, Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told ESPN he thought All-Star voting was a broken system, mostly because the vote totals are low enough to represent a tiny percentage of fans.
"S---, nobody even tried to hack it," Cuban said. "That's how bored they are."
A Graphika chart of Kevin Durant's Twitter support shows a typical NBA star, whose Twitter votes come mostly from fans of the local team, without overseas help (a la Pachulia), pop star support (a la Paul) or carefully cultivated constituencies (a la Embiid).
KEVIN DURANT'S VOTING pattern looks much like Leonard's -- largely driven by fans of the local team -- but without the frenetic bot activity. Indeed, Graphika's analysis found that 52 percent of the Twitter vote for Durant follows the Warriors, and many of the rest are also Bay Area sports fan accounts.
Durant is no Embiid or Pachulia, and this pattern might not be a portrait of an avid global interest in All-Star voting. But it does at least look to be uncorrupted. Yet each social media expert contacted by ESPN reached the same conclusion about the current voting system: It's vulnerable.
There's pressure to get it right. In many cases, there's more than prestige at stake. It's not unusual for player contracts -- with teams and sponsors -- to have significant incentives for making the All-Star team.
A.J. Lawrence, a Brooklyn-based angel investor in social media startups and previous owner of the New York-based digital strategy company JAR Group, says campaigns based on sophisticated fake social media accounts are something to guard actively against.
"Just check out some of the things we saw during the last election cycle, but overall they are a very cheap way to try and trick people," he said.
Williams of proofLabs adds: "The bottom line is that there is a well-established cottage industry of influencer marketing operators that specialize in getting content trending on social channels via coordinated networks of Twitter accounts."
As for Saklev, the Kawhi Leonard superfan, while he might have failed to hack the system this time, he predicted that attempts to manipulate this year's social media voting would spook the NBA into rethinking the process all the same.
"I think probably from the next year, the fans voting percentage will be lowered maybe to 33 percent or even 25 percent," he wrote in an email. "Or maybe the social-network voting will be canceled fully."
We all want to have a home that is show worthy but keeping up with ever-changing home decor trends is nearly impossible, not to mention expensive. So instead of constantly chasing the latest home decor fad, opt for timeless home decor. This may sound hard but we have done all the hard work for you. Below are five of our favorite home decorating tips to create timeless home decor.
1) Pick the perfect color
We're talking neutrals here. Opt out of the eccentric colors and stick with the basics. You can never go wrong with warm or gray tones. For a warm toned home look for light tans, lavender and ochre. If you're leaning toward gray choose a lighter gray such as dove gray. Selecting a neutral and non-overpowering color will make your rooms feel larger and will likely compliment your furniture.
2) Lighting is key
Having a room that is well lit gives the illusion of roominess. If you are fortunate enough to have a room with natural lighting--don't cover it up. When purchasing window treatments choose ones that allow the natural light to flow in such as sheer curtains or shades that can be pulled up when not in use. If there is not natural lighting invest in lamps. This is a great opportunity to decorate as well--there is a large variety of both table top and floor lamps that can liven up a space. To keep the timeless home decor style, make sure you purchase lamps that air on the side of simple.
3) Make sure your furniture is functional
The latest furniture trends are certainly cute but they are not comfortable. Make sure that the furniture you choose dozen't just look good, it feels good too. There are plenty of stylish furniture options that are also comfortable. After all we want to be able to live in our homes not just show them off.
4) Make your storage stylish
Keeping your house organized is a guaranteed way to help your home look like those on Pinterest. Organizing your home dozen't mean having plastic bins laying around there are a myriad decorative organization tools. Whether you choose to organize with hanging wall baskets or ornate drawers, there is a stylish organizational solution for every room of your home.
There are so many appealing home decorations it's hard to not want them all; but not every wall, tabletop and corner need to be decorated. Choose home decor that is useful--storage baskets or a tabletop decoration that you actually use. The more useless pieces you have cluttering your home the messier and less show worthy it will appear. Plus the less you have the less you have to clean.
Don't get me wrong there is always a place for a modern or unique piece of home decor--not everything in your home needs to be a timeless piece. Make Home lighting your staples; your furniture, wall color and general theme, timeless and add splashes of super trendy Contemporary lighting home decor. Textiles are a great way to do this--add a funky throw pillow and interestingly textured blanket to your seating arrangement.
Let's enter fantasyland for a moment. What if you went home from work today and told your spouse that the best thing that happened at the office in months was a team meeting that ran all day? That you got more done in that day than in a normal month -- and to top it off, it was really fun.
Contrast this vision -- which probably sounds delusional -- with most team meetings. As someone who has studied this up close as both an academic and as a consultant, I've said for years that most businesses would be better off if all meetings were disbanded. The reason is that three-quarters of tribal meetings are so nonfunctional that you'd be better off taking a nap instead.
Thanks to input from three friends, our meetings at CultureSync are like the fantasy I described. Two of the friends are from the Agile/Scrum world, Daniel Mezick and Si Alhir. The third is Robert Richman from Zappos Insights, whose excitement for what Daniel had accomplished at Zappos was so pure and joyful that it reminded me of my three-year-old daughter when she gets ice cream.
Let's be clear on the benefits of following the guidance in this blog post. Your meetings will transform from slow marches in the snow without food or water into hyper-productive sessions in which -- are you sitting down? -- people love the process and can't wait for the next session. At Robert's suggestion, our CultureSync team Scrum metode invited Daniel Mezick to put us through a boot camp based on the principles of Scrum.
The result: We got more done in two days than in two months. People who normally hate meetings (I'm raising my hand here) were almost speechless with how productive and fun they were. By the end, Si's words were ringing in my ears: "Tribal Leadership and Scrum are perfect for each other." (Daniel and Robert had said the same thing, but I'm a slow learner.)
So how can you make your meetings like ours? You should immediately pre-order Daniel's book, The Culture Game. (Full disclosure: I endorsed the book, and it quotes Tribal Leadership many times, but I have no financial interest in the book doing well -- except that if companies actually did what Daniel recommends, they would become so productive that the stock market would double.) Until your book arrives, here are several steps you can take right away to make your meetings more fun and productive. It's all in the details here, so please follow every step exactly.
First, start your next meeting by designating three roles. One is "Facilitator." (In real Scrum, this role should be the "Scrum Master," but doing so requires training outside the scope of this blog post.) The second is the "Product Owner," the person who defines what qualifies as the "deliverable." Scrum has very few rules, but one is that the Facilitator (Scrum Master) cannot also be the Product Owner. The third role is the team, and that's everyone else.
Second, start your next meeting with the Facilitator helping the group establish working agreements. Do this by asking people how they respond when others bury their nose in their laptops or multitask with their smartphones. Don't be surprised if the chief offenders here (I'm holding my hand up again) may say that they find it annoying. Then, as a temporary working agreement, ask what the group is willing to commit to. Most will say "no cell phones," "no computers," "no phone calls," etc. The Facilitator should post these on the wall or whiteboard, where they are visible to everyone. Note that they will say this -- it requires no confrontation on the part of the Facilitator.
Also, some people during this process may disclose that they have some reason to break Scrum metode the rules, and these exceptions go up on the list. In our meetings, I mentioned two people by name whose calls I would take. I then pushed my cell phone to the center of the conference table so everyone else could verify that I would take a call only from those people -- and not from my bookie.
Third, set a schedule. For an extended meeting, like one going all morning, establish clear breaks. We settled on 50-minute work cycles with 10-minute breaks. During the breaks, people can email, text, use the restroom, refill their coffee cup, or anything else -- including going outside for some fresh air. The blocks of work are called "iterations." The psychological impact of knowing that a break is just a few minutes away transforms the iterations from possibly pointless meetings into goal-directed bursts of activity. People know that even a wandering, off-purpose iteration will end. You'll find that everyone will be far more able to stay engaged and avoid the beeps and vibrations from their electronic friends.
Fourth, start each iteration with a big countdown clock, visible to everyone -- and start it. As it begins to click down, ask the group to define what constitutes "done" for that iteration. Even if the group spends 15 of its 50 minutes on this question, that's a great investment. In one of our meetings, we defined "done" as determining all of our company priorities, assigning them to a group with a lead person, and getting all of this set up on project boards. We had struggled to do exactly that for months, and we did it in a single 50-minute iteration, which included the time to define "done." The team members may ask the Product Owner questions of clarification or scope.
Fifth, do the work to get to "done." Anyone is free to make suggestions or point out that "15:33 is left on the clock." Some groups will start by outlining a set of steps to get to done, and others will jump in. The Facilitator may interrupt and ask if the group knows how it will get to done, but these interruptions should be minimal. This system puts everyone in a flat meeting, without rank. I've implemented this simple form of Scrum in meetings when the CEO came in to check on our progress. In one case, he began to critique the meeting while also playing with his iPhone. In one of the best moments of my professional life, a subordinate pointed out that the CEO was welcome to join, but only as a team member (technically, he was "de-authorized from speaking as the CEO"). And, she added, our rules require no gadgets, so the boss had to please either put down the phone or exit the meeting. He complied and sat down, as a participating team member. He later said that the meeting was the most productive he had ever attended.
Sixth, end the iteration when the clock times out. Alternatively, take a break when the Facilitator calls an end to the session. If you have time before the clock hits zero, ask: "Did we get to done?"
Seventh, after the break, start with a five-minute "retro" on what worked and didn't work in the last meeting. Based on this brief reflection, the Facilitator may ask if the group wants to amend the ground rules, such as "no sidebar conversations." Then start the process again. Begin with a check in on rules and assignment of roles (these likely won't change), and move through establishing "done," doing the work, ending the process, and taking a break.
When I saw this simple form of Scrum work in executive settings, I watched meetings dominated by "I'm great" (and you're not)" tones flip into fully functioning, high-performance tribes. Robert, Daniel and Si, you were right. Sorry it took me so long to catch up.
What I'm outlining here is perhaps only 1 percent of Scrum. If you want to glance at the other 99 percent, check out my personal blog, which has lots of links to Scrum resources and properly credits the people who helped start this movement. This blog also highlights what could be the most important development in executive management since Peter Drucker's ideas.
Imagine 20 facilitators, fully trained in Scrum and Tribal Leadership deployed throughout your company. If you decided to do this, please let me know, so I can buy stock in your company and short your competitors.